Association of Knowledgework

 ABOUT US 
 ADVERTISE
 AFFILIATES
 BLOGS
 BOOKSTORE
 CONFERENCES 
 CONSULTING
 CONTACT US
 HOME PAGE
 JOIN AOK
 SEARCH AOK
 STAR DIALOGUES
 WHITE PAPERS
 

Star Series

Preparing for Conversations with Dave Pollard
Weblogs and Other Social Software for Knowledge Work

Dave Pollard
Consultant
Meeting of Minds and blogger, "How to Save the World"

 

 

  Biography

Dave Pollard was Chief Knowledge Officer for Ernst & Young in Canada from 1994 until recently, following twenty years as an Entrepreneurial Services practitioner. He left E&W, citing differences in philosophies on knowledge management. He has now established his own consultancy, Meeting of Minds, and continues his highly regarded blog, "How to Save the World."Dave Pollard

At E&Y Dave had responsibility in Canada and Latin America for:

  • Developing the firm's knowledge strategy and vision,
  • Design and deployment of knowledge architecture, tools and content,
  • Management of research, analysis, navigation, and specialist network services, and
  • The attainment of a knowledge-sharing culture in the firm.

He was the Global Director of Innovation and Content Management in E&Y's Global CBK (Centre for Business Knowledge), a virtual knowledge organization serving 80,000 practitioners worldwide and employing the firm's business researchers, analysts, database and network coordinators in ten countries and managing the firm's knowledge infrastructure, Intranet, and Extranet.

Dave chaired firm committees and focus groups on the virtual workplace, Web strategy, and business innovation. He also served as a Core Member of the firm's Innovation Team, where he designed the firm's Idea eXchange Innovation Management System. He is a subject matter specialist on knowledge management, business innovation, the virtual workplace and the future of business, and has written and lectured extensively on these topics. He lives in the Caledon Hills near Toronto, and has worked for fifteen years without a permanent office or administrative assistant. An active environmentalist, Dave's hobbies include genealogy, writing short stories and composing music.

Recently Dave's work has been published in several books and magazines, and his weblog is ranked #5 in Canada and has been nominated for several awards.

Dave recently announced his decision to leave E&Y to set up Meeting of Minds which offers social networking (SN) applications, content management and personal productivity advisory services, and The Caring Enterprise Coach, which helps entrepreneurs establish and operate new collaborative enterprises.

Back to top

  Opening Remarks

I'm delighted to have the opportunity to host a discussion with such a distinguished group of knowledge management professionals. My strong feelings of frustration and lack of progress caused me to decide to leave Ernst & Young last December after 27 years, the final 10 of which were as Canadian CKO and Global Director of Knowledge Innovation. Those of you who have read my weblog posts on KM know that I'm something of a pessimist on the current state of KM, and I have struggled for much of the last five years to get E&Y to stop resting on its tarnished laurels (it fell off the MAKE award list for the first time last year) and move ahead in some new and exciting directions, most notably:

  • the use of weblogs and other personal content management tools to share, organize and publish knowledge, and
  • the development of Social Networking Applications (voted Technology of the Year by Business 2.0 magazine) to broaden and deepen connectivity and person-to-person knowledge transfer

The following table summarizes the advantage I see in these new technologies, and reflects my view that Social Networking and Personal Content Management are critical components of the future evolution of KM.

  Knowledge
Management 
Social Networking / Personal Content Management (PCM)
Knowledge
Creation
Strategy
 
 Submit what you know Publish your 'filing cabinet'
Knowledge Use Strategy  Re-use: Find & tailor
appropriate knowledge from central repositories

 
Qualify & Proxy: Use individuals' knowledge to qualify them as
appropriate experts to converse with, and as a surrogate for that
individual when they are not available for conversation

 
Where Knowledge Resides  Large, centralized repositories  Decentralized, in PCM system on laptop (mostly) 
Key Knowledge Tools  Search engines, Community of Practice and collaboration tools
 
Expertise finder, Connector tool, Network Builder tool, Super Address Book, PCM content Publishing & Subscription tool, Simple Virtual Presence tool
 
Critical Connection  People-to-knowledge People-to-people

As I've been discussing with you during David Gurteen's STAR turn, I think the right column above is consistent with David's vision for what he calls Personal (or Interpersonal) Knowledge Management -- PKM/IPKM. The significant difference is that, unlike David, I'm jaundiced about the possibility of changing knowledge culture, processes or behaviours in large organizations. Therefore, I believe the evolution from KM to PKM will occur bottom-up, virally, and only if and when software developers provide, at little or no cost, a suite of simple, intuitive Social Networking and Personal Content Management tools, which will allow any individual knowledge worker to effectively connect to anyone else, inside or outside their organization. At that point what Jerry calls Corporate Knowledge Management will, I believe, largely disappear (and few, I fear, will mourn its loss).

You may have seen or used some of the first-generation Social Networking tools: LinkedIn, Ryze, Orkut etc. If you have, you are probably justifiably disappointed in how little of the promise of these tools has been realized. I have recently developed a blueprint for the development of a sounder architecture for Social Networking, that entails three 'levels' of tools:

  1. Personal Content Management (PCM) tools: to collect, organize and facilitate better use of the knowledge that resides on everyone's desktop, and set "permissions" for others' access to the individual's content
  2. Metadata tools: to automatically "translate" and reorganize the knowledge in the PCM tools into a format useful for other users (friends, networks, associates, customers, suppliers etc.)
  3. Network & connectivity tools: to find experts and people with common interests, connect to them and to people in the individual's networks simply, using various multimedia tools, and to "publish" one's personal knowledge and subscribe to others' knowledge

A key attribute of these tools is simplicity, so they function intuitively and need little or no user training. Another key is that every individual maintains control of their own knowledge, organized as they want. The metadata tools do the "heavy lifting," so there is no need to rework or submit information. The network and connectivity tools maintain no content themselves, but go out and harvest it through the permissioned metadata from individuals' hard drives. A schematic of how these tools would fit together and a detailed example of how they would work in practice can be found at my blog.

The potential implications of this for 'traditional' knowledge management are, I think, immense. Is a corporate Intranet needed at all when peer-to-peer sharing is so easy and powerful, and allows you to share across organizational boundaries, not just within them? Why has so little of the promise of collaboration, explicit knowledge capture, leveraging 'best practices' and communities of practice been realized, and does Social Networking & PCM give up on this promise too easily? And with such free and broad flow of knowledge, what about the 'competitive advantage' of knowledge, and what about information security, and the importance of trust?

I'd be pleased to use this forum to provide further information on some of the newly-developed prototypes that have some of the functionality of the tools described above, and to act as an intermediary between you (as potential power users) and the developers of these prototype tools. However, I'm hoping to have a free-wheeling discussion with you about where KM is going, because I sincerely believe it's "change or die" time for our profession. I'll be surprised if, at the end of our journey together, we haven't all changed our ideas about the value, and future, of knowledge management.

Back to top

  Additional Reading

Back to top