Association of Knowledgework

 ABOUT US 
 ADVERTISE
 AFFILIATES
 BLOGS
 BOOKSTORE
 CONFERENCES 
 CONSULTING
 CONTACT US
 HOME PAGE
 JOIN AOK
 SEARCH AOK
 STAR DIALOGUES
 WHITE PAPERS
 

Star Series

Preparing for Conversations with Denham Grey
Knowledge Sharing and Social Software

  Introduction

Denham Grey has been one of AOK's more controversial members almost from its beginning, not because he has been out of step with the growing body of knowledge of KM itself, but because he is often a burr under the saddles of some of the most highly esteemed leaders in the field. Having never written a book himself, he is a merciless critic of the works of others, sometimes writing reviews even before the Denham Greybooks are published or on the market. With other KM greats, he is effusive and numbers them among his mentors. He makes no bones about whom he likes and dislikes. They should have named him 'Frank.'

His presence here as the 64th STAR Series moderator will not be received well by some of his colleagues. I understand and regret that.

But Denham has earned his place in the series. He is passionate about knowledge management and its relatives, energetic in carrying its message and an effective facilitator of knowledge exchange and archives by maintaining his KM wiki space as an encyclopedia of KM long before there was a broader Wikipedia dedicated to community development of a knowledge space. Whether you love him or hate him, he has secured a solid spot in KM-one of the elite group of six-figure hits in a Google search for Knowledge+(name).

Regardless of his behavior toward some of his colleagues, Denham Grey is not to be ignored, and some of his work has exceptional value. He will share that here.

Denham is most passionate about social networking, and this warm-up to the Conversations with Denham Grey includes his thoughts on the subject. But what's new to this space is the Knowledge Sharing and Social Software resource page he has developed particularly for this Dialogue. Since we are largely focused on the 'human side' of KM, we either ignore the place of technology in KM or resist the inflated belief that IT is KM's driving force. Of course, we know better than to say that IT is not a vital support mechanism for KM; yet, we have given it too little attention here. Denham brings that to us for the first time. A summary and link to the Wiki page can be found below.

So there you have it-my take on Denham Grey. Enjoy the last STAR Series Dialogue for 2005 in a Conversation with Denham Grey. We will take our usual hiatus in December, although look for a surprise Special Dialogue associated with a project AOK is undertaking. Mysterious? Yep!

Back to top

  Biography

Denham Grey began his KM journey way back in 1985, when he first heard about expert systems, decision support technology that captured the smarts of consultants and gurus in limited domains. While building these systems for forestry, GIS and soil interpretation, he came to appreciate the importance of relationships, conversation, dialog and social exchange for continuous learning and knowledge development.

He moved to the US from South Africa in 1994 after helping Nelson Mandela win the election there. Denham's entire family served as election officials for the Mandela campaign.

After moving to the US, he helped Fortune 500 companies capture solutions to common problems for the helpdesk industry, assisted Etienne Wenger with e-learning classes introducing communities of practice to the business world in 1998. He taught postgraduate classes at Indiana University, Purdue University in Indianapolis in business and strategic intelligence, human - computer interaction and personal networking.

Since then Denham has practiced and consulted on advanced knowledge practices including knowledge mapping using boundary objects, concept mapping for improving shared understanding, patterns to capture and validate experience, refactoring and annealing collaborative writing in wikis and building dynamic corporate memories.

As CEO of GreyMatter Inc., Denham has worked with companies within the US and abroad, helping virtual teams with practices such as forming distinctions, developing ontologies, classification systems and writing pattern languages. KmWiki, which he launched and managed, became the largest collaborative knowledge management repository on the web.

Denham remains active in KM web forums, publishes the widely respected "knowledge-at-work" KM weblog and is leading the way in KM podcasting. He maintains a keen interest in emergent social software exploring their implications for knowledge creation and innovation.

Back to top

  AOK Wiki - Podcasting, Mappping and More

During this Dialogue, Denham will discuss emergent software tools that can be used to share knowledge commonly called - social software technologies - examples include podcasts, collaborative concept maps, web feeds and blogs, tagging and social bookmarking. We will explore how they are part of a set of an exciting new genre that assist with conversations, make connections, promote collaboration and help context sharing.

In tandem with the Dialogue, Denham has developed a wiki as a reference space to provide a take-away from the STAR series and a link collection for visiting afterwards.

Subjects in the wiki page include:

  • Podcasting

Podcasting is a means of distributing audio and video programs via the Internet that lets users subscribe to a number of files, also known as a "feed" and then to hear or view the material at the time that they choose.

What is the link between KM and podcasting? Clearly podcasting helps with the distribution of information, can be useful for individual and group learning, may be combined with blogs and RSS feeds to provide syndication, feedback and news. The exact role of podcasting in KM has not had time to develop but there are early indications that the channel is rather one-way.

  • Collaborative Concept Mapping

Concept maps show relationships between domain concepts in the form of a hierarchy. They consist of nodes and links with labels and are useful tools for learning, creating shared meaning, helping with knowledge creation, elicitation and capture. The real power of concept mapping comes with tools that allow collaborative editing. Now it is possible to synchronously annotate, discuss, link to resources, change the spatial arrangement, style and color and add your propositions to the diagram itself. This allows visual annealing and refactoring a powerful advanced practice for knowledge work

  • Feeds and Blogs

What is a web feed?

An XML-based document which contains content items, often summaries of stories, podcasts or weblog posts with web links to longer versions. Weblogs and news websites are common sources for web feeds, but feeds are also used to deliver structured information, in the form of an alert or notification, ranging from weather data to "top ten" lists of hit tunes. While RSS feed is by far the most common term, the generic "web feed" terminology is sometimes used by writers hoping to make the concept clear to novice users, and by advocates of non-RSS feed formats.

  • Social Search and Bookmarking

Social bookmarking is an activity performed over a computer network that allows users to save, tag and categorize (see folksonomy) a personal collection of bookmarks and share them with others. Users may also take bookmarks saved by others and add them to their own collection, as well as to subscribe to the lists of others-a personal knowledge management tool.

  • Rip, Mix and Learn

"New Internet based, "social" technologies that are used extensively by the digital generation will be revolutionizing the shape and modality of future learning." Alan Levine.

Ripping is gathering digital content, mix is selecting, edit and/or recombining, feed is to transmit and to share.

Today, when we browse and search, we invoke a series of chance operations - we use interfaces, icons, and text as a flexible set of languages and tools. Our semantic web is a remix of all available information - display elements, metadata, services, images, and especially content - made immediately accessible.

Back to top

  Social Knowledge - A Personal Account

Surowiecki's "The wisdom of crowds" tells anecdotes and stories that illustrate some of the advantages of collective decision-making, but my epiphany runs deeper that decisions and problem solving, to the very nature of knowledge itself. The route to working with knowledge lies through people, building relationships and trust, deep dialog and creative abrasion. There needs to be diversity of ideas and an environment where failures and reflection are valued as learning enablers.

"Knowledge is embodied in people gathered in communities and networks. The road to knowledge is via people, conversations, connections and relationships. Knowledge surfaces through dialog, all knowledge is socially mediated and access to knowledge is by connecting to people that know or know who to contact."

  • Toward Principles
    The importance of cohorts

You may obtain information from the 'sage on the stage' a book or CBT, but you learn on the playing field, where your identity is forged, opinions are validated, values mediated, beliefs formed and assumptions are tested. Social mediation is key, and this is where cohorts help you make meaning and gain understanding. We own a social brain and apprenticeship is the natural way to learn. We need cohorts and community to build a shared repertoire of key concepts, evolve tools, craft language, gather stories and highlight sensitivities. This is where learning products reside.

Sharing meaning

Shared meaning is the difference between personal knowing and acquired understanding or social knowledge. This is the power behind language and communication. Points to the essential role of sharing critique, alignment and reflection in learning. Meaning is established through patterning, emotions play a key role. To make meaning explicit and ensure alignment, it is essential to question and test assumptions.

Crafting distinctions

Creating new knowledge comes from bringing forth new worlds, from agreeing and naming subtle signs, symptoms, patterns and perceptions that enable alternative courses of action. Mostly this happens as a natural byproduct of conversations within groups and is recognized by the issues, the values, the beliefs and in the language of a community of practice. Often encoded in the 'slang' and group talk that sets the community apart. Distinctions are closely related to ontologies and to making meaning. They contribute a large measure to identity.

Deep learning, identity and dialog

Knowing is an act of participation, knowledge is more a living process than acquisition of an object, it is closely tied to who we are and emerges in dialog or through copy and practice. Lasting knowledge is knowing more than definitions, concepts and relationships, it is feeling what is right in a particular situation, requires personal engagement, passion and a community to emerge. Learning and knowledge require an ecology to thrive and evolve.

Generative learning

New insights arise at the boundaries between communities, connections and reflections, are key to synthesis and access to new ideas. The learning potential of an organization lies in maintaining a tension and a balance between core practices and active boundary processes. Identity and meaningfulness are the wellspring of creativity, sharing is a natural by-product of belonging. Learning and understanding is more about community than content .

Creative abrasion, high challenge and safety

Dorothy Leonard struck a chord talking of creative abrasion. To change your mindset you need to raise the energy levels, increase the attention and focus. This is difficult to achieve in a placid conversation. Exposure to alternative assumptions and frames, some advocacy, deep dialog, strong engagement and a pure clash of ideas help to unsettle, and resettle meaning. Prior beliefs are difficult to change using reading, classroom instruction and teaching as telling. Taken too far, increasing stress levels will reduce the learning opportunity, there is a fine balance to be maintained.

Boundary hopping and busting prototypes

The sweet spot for learning is at the boundaries of individual and community. Here you are less sure and secure , core rigidities are lower, you are flooded with new thought forms, alternative analogies and metaphors. Making connections is key and often follows trusted relationships.

In the knowledge economy, connections and relationships count more than personal know-how and access to content. The environment changes so fast, the optimum knowledge strategy is instant access to people and their ideas and continuous awareness and learning in a supportive community. People and discourse communities provide the 'filter' mechanism for alerting and awareness. This helps to keep your focus, provides market intelligence and affords a platform for negotiating meaning and value. A key heuristic is to: annotate complex documents with contact people who can coach, situate and explain. This is a higher quality connection than hyper-linking to yet more content.

Back to top

  • My call

Personal identity and context are key in all forms of knowledge work. They determine your propensity to share, inquire, probe, prototype, experiment and question. Identity regulates your engagement in deep dialog and controls your ability to engage in creative abrasion.

  • Community is a prerequisite for continuous learning. This does not have to be a CoP, a discourse community is just as valuable as it delivers awareness, helps to sensitize, alter mental models and surface assumptions.
  • Knowledge needs negotiation imposed (mediated) social values and reflection, separate knowledge from personal knowing and individual competence (skills)
  • Knowledge is situated some knowledge is present in social ritual, inventions and artifacts. Reification changes the nature of objects turning them into knowledge artifacts (social objects)
  • Knowledge needs representation, inference, critique and reflection are improved when there is something tangible to work from. This is not the essential aspect of knowledge, but representation and reification are key for building longer term memory, promoting learning and are needed to scale knowledge work. We need to be mindful of what is lost when we represent and need to heed that any representation is a powerful filter.

Reciprocity and engagement is the price system for knowledge within a firm, the route to shared meaning and real knowing

  Links

Back to top